Simulated peer review · Review instructions

The instructions, in full

Designed specifically to simulate the peer review of reputable academic journals, with an emphasis on the philosophy of mind, language, perception, and knowledge, and on artificial intelligence.

The intended scholarly standard is the rigorous assessment of reasoning and evidence associated with journals such as Mind, Philosophical Studies, Mind & Language, and the Journal of Consciousness Studies. The service is not affiliated with or endorsed by these journals. Read the full instructions below before sharing your writing.

The text below comes directly from the review service: the exact system prompt and user-message template used to construct a review request. Your writing and optional context fill the template at submission; they are not loaded on this page.

The instructions call for an impartial assessment of reasoning and evidence in a simulated academic referee report: a summary, an ACCEPT, REVISE, or REJECT recommendation, blocking issues, major revisions, and minor issues, strengths, and a verification trail. A target journal can be named in the form's optional context; any venue-fit assessment remains provisional.

Reports are AI-generated, not reviews by human scholars, and can be mistaken or biased. The service does not independently retrieve sources, verify external facts or citations, or check current journal policies. The report must distinguish internal checks from unverified claims. No journal is affiliated with or endorses this service.

Loading the current instructions…

Download full instructions (.txt)

Return to your writing · Navigation does not save a draft. Keep your own copy before leaving the form.